🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts about that comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been appropriate. Instead, he invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard went on to thrash a tired Serbian in the next round). He stated in press after the loss that he actually preferred his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the global rankings entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and concussive strength on each forehand and backhand are more than enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. Two years later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

The American star made a career-best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a horrendous game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive energy to win it. Down set points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to the sky. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told a journalist in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely improbable for everybody else. {